| Introduction:
Independent School District #2
(ISD2) is committed to providing high-quality educational opportunities,
that meet the requirements of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) and the NM
Content Standards and Benchmarks, to all students. To translate this
commitment into a sustainable and meaningful strategic plan, students,
parents, the staff, and the ISD#2 School Board members met at various times
to discuss student performance and corresponding educational improvements.
During these meetings, they revised the ISD2 Educational Plan for Student
Success (EPSS). The revisions were designed to address student learning
needs as demonstrated in the results of the SY 2006 – 2007 New Mexico
Criterion Referenced Test (CRT).
The Datil Elementary School
EPSS is available by clicking
HERE.
ISD2 Strategic Planning
ISD2 consists of three
schools, Datil Elementary School (DES), Quemado Elementary School (QES),
Quemado High School (QHS). In 1995, these schools began developing
their EPSS. A committee was formed. Community, student, and staff
assessments and surveys were conducted. Initial focus areas were
determined based on the information developed.
The committee revises the
EPSS document regularly. Additional surveys are conducted annually.
Regular student, staff, and community assessment is performed. Since
the EPSS Committee consists of community members, staff, and students,
the revision process consists of receiving direct input from a variety
of stake holders. The results of these surveys, assessments, and
discussions are made public through the school board, community, and
EPSS meetings, and through electronic and print documents.
The Parent/Community
Advisory Committee members (PCAC) have played a key role in the district
decision making process. Members are selected from different parts of
the district to
·
review documents
·
observe the teaching process
·
make presentations to the local Board of Education.
The district continues
its commitment to improving and offering students the best educational
opportunities and learning environments possible. To ensure this, the
district has completed detailed strategic plans in the Title I Program,
the Student Assistance Team Process, and the School Safety Program. In
essence, the goals of the local Title I Program are
1.
To endeavor to have all students reading at or above grade level
by the end of 6th grade
2.
To provide research based, quality programs to improve literacy
in grades K – 6
3.
To strengthen the partnership between home and school to improve
student learning
4.
To provide materials, curriculum, and teacher training necessary
to ensure student learning
The goal of the Student Assistance Team is
Assist
all students in succeeding within the regular educational setting with
the standard curriculum and reduce unnecessary referrals to special
education.
The goal of the School Safety Program is
Provide a safe learning environment to
all students and emergency procedures.
ISD2 is committed to
continuing the EPSS Process, the Title I Program, the Student Assistance
Team Process, and the School Safety Program. In order to ensure that
these are vibrant, living tools in our educational process, ISD2 will
follow the Plan, Do, Study, Act model as described in the Baldridge
Program. The district EPSS Committee is confident that through the
cyclic evaluation and revision of the district EPSS, we can offer our
students the best possible opportunities for success.
| Goal 1 |
The percentage of students,
who attend Independent School District #2, who score proficient
or above in mathematics, will increase by at least 10%, based on
results from the 2005 New Mexico Standard-Based Assessment (NMSBA),
from 30% to 40%. |
| Strategy or Activity |
The students will express mathematical thought
in grade-level appropriate writing. |
| Person(s) Responsible |
Students, teachers, administrators, school
board, parents |
| Resources |
Available |
Local staff, school library, text books, local
technologies (A+ LS, Math Type 4.0, etc., NCTM, NMCTM, Internet,
ancillary services, peer tutors |
| Needed |
Inservice training, K - 12 writing rubrics |
| Implementation Timeline |
Fall 05: Local staff will plan and deliver
inservice training (completed Oct 05). Fall 05: Local staff
will develop writing rubrics that will be used by all staff.
Spring 06: The staff will review student writing in
mathematics during an inservice day. |
| Evaluation Timeline |
Spring 06: Inservice and writing rubrics will be
completed. Spring 06: Staff will complete the review of
student writing.
Short-cycle assessment at the end of each quarter.
Spring 06: Students will complete the CRT.
Summer 06: Staff will review student performance on the CRT. |
| Professional Development |
Local staff will plan and deliver inservice
training.
Local staff will research mathematics programs for ways to
improve student writing. |
| Parent and Community Involvement |
The staff will research and plan how to set
up a Writing Fair modeled on Science Fair.
HS student advisors will contact parents about student
performance. |
| Evidence of Completion |
The percentage of students who are
proficient at mathematics will increase by 10%.
Teachers will publish and implement the
writing rubrics.
Teachers will attend the Writing in Mathematics inservice
programs. |
| Goal 1 |
The percentage of students,
who attend Independent School District #2, who score proficient
or above in mathematics, will increase by at least 10%, based on
results from the 2005 New Mexico Standard-Based Assessment (NMSBA),
from 30% to 40%. |
| Strategy or Activity |
The
students will practice grade-level mathematics skills daily. |
| Person(s) Responsible |
Students, Teachers,
Administrators, School Board,
Parents |
| Resources |
Available |
Local staff, School library, Text
books, Local technologies (A+ LS, Math Type 4.0, etc.), NCTM,
NMCTM, Internet, Ancillary services |
| Needed |
None |
| Implementation Timeline |
Teachers will
immediately ensure that students practice mathematics skills
daily.
Fall 05: The HS math
teacher will train all elementary teachers to use the A+
Learning System to deliver effective, standards-based
mathematics instruction.
Weekly: Administrators
will review lesson plans weekly to ensure that meaningful
mathematical activities are planned.
Monthly: Administrators will
observe teachers, during lesson delivery, to ensure that
teachers are delivering effective mathematical instruction and
exercises. |
| Evaluation Timeline |
Fall 05: Teacher
training in the use of the A+ LS will be complete.
Short-cycle assessment
at the end of each quarter
Spring 06: Students
will complete the CRT
Summer 06: Staff will review
student performance on the CRT. |
| Professional Development |
The HS
mathematics teacher will train all elementary teachers to use
the A+ LS to deliver effective, standards-based mathematics
instruction. |
| Parent and Community Involvement |
HS student
advisors will contact parents about student performance. |
| Evidence of Completion |
The percentage of students who are
proficient at mathematics will increase by 10%. |
| Goal 1 |
The percentage of students, who
attend Independent School District #2, who score proficient or
above in mathematics, will increase by at least 10%, based on
results from the 2005 New Mexico Standards-Based Assessment (NMSBA),
from 30% to 40%. |
| Strategy or Activity |
The students
will use current educational technology in the mathematics
curriculum. |
| Person(s) Responsible |
Students, Teachers, Administrators, School
Board, Parents |
| Resources |
Available |
Local staff, School library, Text books,
Local technologies (A+ LS, Math Type 4.0, etc.), NCTM, NMCTM,
Internet |
| Needed |
Teacher training |
| Implementation Timeline |
Fall 05: The HS math teacher will train all
elementary teachers to use the A+ Learning System to deliver
effective, standards-based mathematics instruction.
Spring 06: The HS math teacher will show
case various mathematics related software (e.g. equation
editors, simulations, math games like Math Blaster.) |
| Evaluation Timeline |
Fall 05: Teacher training in the use of the
A+ LS will be complete.
Short-cycle assessment at the end of each
quarter
Spring 06: Students will complete the CRT
Summer 06: Staff will review student performance on the CRT. |
| Professional Development |
The HS mathematics teacher will train all
elementary teachers to use the A+ LS to deliver effective,
standards-based mathematics instruction. |
| Parent and Community Involvement |
HS student advisors will contact parents about
student performance. |
| Evidence of Completion |
The percentage of students who are
proficient at mathematics will increase by 10%. |
| Goal 2 |
The percentage of students, who
attend Independent School District #2, who score proficient or
above in reading, will increase by at least 10%, based on
results from the 2005 New Mexico Standards-Based Assessment (NMSBA),
from 47% to 57%. |
| Strategy or Activity |
Teachers will
provide educational opportunities to students to help them
develop reading strategies to improve comprehension. |
| Person(s) Responsible |
Students, Teachers, Administrators, School
Board, Parents |
| Resources |
Available |
Local staff, School library, Text books,
Local technologies , Title I, Reading First, Harcourt, Internet,
Ancillary services |
| Needed |
Volunteers, Additional staff, Training for
staff and volunteers, Time for collaboration and joint planning |
| Implementation Timeline |
Immediate |
| Evaluation Timeline |
Spring 06: Students will complete the CRT
Short-cycle assessment at the end of each
quarter
Summer 06: Staff will review student performance on the CRT. |
| Professional Development |
Spring 06: Teachers will attend a workshop about
writing and using rubrics. |
| Parent and Community Involvement |
HS student advisors will contact parents
about student performance.
Parents ensure that K-6 students read nightly, and send a note
to the teachers |
| Evidence of Completion |
The percentage of students who are
proficient at reading will increase by 10%. |
| Goal 2 |
The percentage of students, who
attend Independent School District #2, who score proficient or
above in reading, will increase by at least 10%, based on
results from the 2005 New Mexico Standards-Based Assessment (NMSBA),
from 47% to 57%. |
| Strategy or Activity |
Teachers will
provide educational opportunities to students to help them learn
to summarize, orally and in writing, what they have read. |
| Person(s) Responsible |
Students, Teachers, Administrators, School
Board, Parents |
| Resources |
Available |
Local staff, School library, Text books,
Local technologies, Title I, Reading First, Harcourt, Internet,
Ancillary services |
| Needed |
Volunteers, Additional staff, Training for
staff and volunteers, Time for collaboration and joint planning |
| Implementation Timeline |
Immediate. |
| Evaluation Timeline |
Spring 06: Students will complete the CRT
Short-cycle assessment at the end of each
quarter
Summer 06: Staff will review student performance on the CRT. |
| Professional Development |
Spring 06: Teachers will attend a workshop about
writing and using rubrics. |
| Parent and Community Involvement |
The staff will research and plan how to set
up a Writing Fair modeled on Science Fair.
HS student advisors will contact parents about student
performance. |
| Evidence of Completion |
The percentage of students who are
proficient at reading will increase by 10%. |
| Goal 2 |
The percentage of students, who
attend Independent School District #2, who score proficient or
above in reading, will increase by at least 10%, based on
results from the 2005 New Mexico Standards-Based Assessment (NMSBA),
from 47% to 57%. |
| Strategy or Activity |
Teachers will
provide educational opportunities to students to help them
develop grammar, structure, punctuation, and word usage skills. |
| Person(s) Responsible |
Students, Teachers, Administrators, School
Board, Parents |
| Resources |
Available |
Local staff, School library, Text books,
Local technologies , Title I, Reading First, Harcourt, Internet,
Ancillary services |
| Needed |
Volunteers, Additional staff, Training for
staff and volunteers, Time for collaboration and joint planning |
| Implementation Timeline |
Immediate |
| Evaluation Timeline |
Spring 06: Students will complete the CRT
Short-cycle assessment at the end of each
quarter
Summer 06: Staff will review student performance on the CRT. |
| Professional Development |
Spring 06: Teachers will attend a workshop about
writing and using rubrics. |
| Parent and Community Involvement |
HS student advisors will contact parents about
student performance. |
| Evidence of Completion |
The percentage of students who are
proficient at reading will increase by 10%. |
Student Assessment Data
According to the 2005
School Accountability Report, DES, QES, and QHS met AYP. However, the
students did not perform as well as ISD2 staff believes they should
have. Only 15.63% of QES students were proficient in mathematics, and
31.25% in reading. Only 30.19% of QHS students were proficient in
mathematics, and 47.17% in reading. Since DES tested only 8 students,
no proficiency rates were reported. However, DES and district staff
feel that the rate would have been comparable to QES and QHS.
Based on these
proficiency rates, the ISD2 EPSS Committee has identified improved
student performance in mathematics and reading as the EPSS goals for SY
2005 – 2006. The Committee established the follow EPSS goals for SY
2005 – 2006
The
percentage of students, who attend Independent School District #2, who
score proficient or above in mathematics, will increase by at least 10%,
based on results from the 2005 New Mexico Standards-Based Assessment (NMSBA),
from 30% to 40%.
and
The
percentage of students, who attend Independent School District #2, who
score proficient or above in reading, will increase by at least 10%,
based on results from the 2005 New Mexico Standards-Based Assessment (NMSBA),
from 47% to 57%.
Additionally, the EPSS
Committee also felt that improved student performance in communication
skills (i.e. writing, oral presentation, and electronic communication)
should have been a goal. But, since no CRT data were available on this,
and the NM PED directed that all goals be data driven, no distinct
communication goal was established. Given how strongly the ISD2 EPSS
Committee felt on this issue, communication skills were included as
major strategies in support of the mathematics and reading goals.
During SY 2006 – 2007, staff attempted to use A+
Learning System resources for short-cycle assessment materials. The
experiment failed. Major causes of the failure were the cumbersomeness of
the system and the lengthiness of the assessments. Additionally, problems
arose as teachers tried to access the resulting assessment data. Therefore,
ISD#2 discontinued this experiment.
Subsequently, the administration and staff discussed
what would constitute valid short-cycle assessment. They identified the
following characteristics:
·
Short-cycle assessment must be aligned to the New Mexico
Standards and Benchmarks.
·
Short-cycle assessment must be objective.
·
Short-cycle assessment must be easy to administer and
evaluate.
·
Short-cycle assessment must have minimal impact on teaching
time.
During Spring 07, staff
evaluated various materials that could be used for short-cycle assessment to
determine how well they fit the characteristics. As of this revision, the
staff believes that the MAPS assessment system will meet the district
needs for short-cycle assessment. ISD#2 implemented this during SY 2007 –
2008. Implementation involved local training by district staff, on-line
training proctored by the assessment provider, on-site training by MAPS
personnel, local monitoring, and use of the MAPS system in informing
instruction. ISD#2 administrative staff will determine whether this
assessment system will continue to meet district needs during June and July
of 2008. However, the preliminary finding is that MAPS does meet these
needs. Hence, at this time, it is anticipated that ISD#2 will continue to
use MAPS for short-cycle assessment for the foreseeable future.Review Process
The administration will review
progress toward the ISD2 goals at least semi-annually. The review will be
based on local short-cycle assessment results and student performance on the
CRT. The purposes of the review will be to
- revise the EPSS to
ensure continued student improvement
- ensure that teachers are
providing well planned and executed educational opportunities that
support the EPSS goals
- ensure that students are
taking advantage of the educational opportunities provided
These reviews will be
documented by the administration on each EPSS goal sheet. This
documentation will be maintained in the administrative offices.
The District EPSS Committee
will review progress toward the ISD2 goals at least annually during the 1st
quarter of each school year after CRT data are available. The review will
be based on student performance on the CRT. The purpose of the review will
be to revise the EPSS to ensure continued student improvement. These
reviews will be documented in district EPSS document.
|